Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix GH7

Micro Four Thirds video flagship with ProRes RAW and open gate.

$2,199

Released Jun 2024

Lumix GH7 is 1.6 years newer.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Lumix GH7

Video & HybridSports & Action

5 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories·Lumix GH7 wins 3 categories
  • BLumix GH7 has higher Max video bit rate (1900 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BLumix GH7 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 380 shots)
  • BLumix GH7 has higher Burst (electronic) (75 fps vs 40 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix GH7
Resolution24.2 MP25.2 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps75 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop7.5-stop
Weight680 g805 g
Battery760 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix GH7

138 × 100 × 100 mm

805 g (1.77 lb / 28.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 2mm shorter and 11mm thinner than Lumix GH7.

EOS R6 Mark II is 125 g lighter than Lumix GH7.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 100mm Lumix GH7

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix GH7

138 × 100 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix GH7

138 × 100 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix GH7

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix GH7

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix GH7
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 98.4, 88.4

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 380 shots — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

  • Weight

    680 g vs 805 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix GH7

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Max video bit rate

    1900 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 100.3, 99.6

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Burst (electronic)

    75 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    14 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix GH7

Pros

  • Pro video toolset
  • Open gate
  • Compact MFT
  • Strong codecs

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Still resolution limits
  • Premium for MFT

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GH7
Resolution
24.2 MP
25.2 MP+4%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GH7
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
1053+35%
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GH7
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
14 fps+17%
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
75 fps+88%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+6%
170 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GH7
Max resolution
4K UHD
5.8K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
1900 Mbps5.6× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Apple ProRes RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ, H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GH7
Weight
680 g−125 g less
805 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138.4 × 100.3 × 99.6 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix GH7?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Lumix GH7 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix GH7 is 25.2 MP, so the Lumix GH7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix GH7 has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix GH7?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix GH7 reaches 75 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix GH7 weighs 805 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 125 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix GH7: 5.8K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GH7 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix GH7: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 380 shots for the Lumix GH7, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix GH7 at $2,199. The Lumix GH7 is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.