Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

Lumix S5 II

Phase-detect L-mount hybrid with 6K open gate and strong video tools.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2023

vs

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

Lumix S5 II is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Lumix S5 II

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix S5 II wins 3 categories·GR III wins 2 categories
  • ALumix S5 II has higher AF points / zones (779 vs 49)
  • ALumix S5 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR III has lower Weight (257 g vs 740 g)
  • ALumix S5 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (9 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix S5 IIGR III
Resolution24.2 MP24.24 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max51,200102,400
Burst30 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS5-stopYes
Weight740 g257 g
Battery370 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix S5 II

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

Lumix S5 II is 25mm wider, 40mm taller, and 57mm thicker than GR III.

Lumix S5 II is 483 g heavier than GR III.

Depth (front-to-back): 90mm Lumix S5 II · 33mm GR III

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix S5 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix S5 IIGR III
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
7.5Good✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    779 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, MP4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Car…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    9 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Lumix S5 II supports it

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    257 g vs 740 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Resolution

    24.24 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix S5 II

Pros

  • Phase-detect AF finally
  • 6K open gate
  • IBIS
  • Great value

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • L-mount size
  • AF still behind Canon/Sony

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix S5 II and GR III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix S5 II
GR III
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.24 MP
Sensor type
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.6 x 23.8 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
Lumix S5 II
GR III
Processor
Venus Engine
GR ENGINE 6
Lumix S5 II
GR III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
102,400+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
Lumix S5 II
GR III
Shutter type
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec
Lumix S5 II
GR III
AF system
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
77915.9× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
Face, Eye

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Lumix S5 II or GR III?

Lumix S5 II scores 7.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR III — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix S5 II and GR III?

Lumix S5 II is 24.2 MP and GR III is 24.24 MP, so the GR III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix S5 II and GR III have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix S5 II has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR III has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix S5 II or the GR III?

Lumix S5 II reaches 30 fps electronic. GR III reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix S5 II and GR III?

Lumix S5 II weighs 740 g and GR III weighs 257 g, so the GR III is 483 g lighter.

Do the Lumix S5 II and GR III record 4K video?

Lumix S5 II: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p. GR III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Lumix S5 II and GR III weather sealed?

Lumix S5 II: Yes. GR III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 370 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix S5 II and 200 shots for the GR III, giving the Lumix S5 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix S5 II launched at $1,999 and GR III at $899. The GR III is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.