Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Released Mar 2019

vs

Ricoh

GR IV HDF

GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.

$1,599

Released Jan 2026

GR IV HDF is 6.8 years newer.

Wins

1categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

Wins

3categories

GR IV HDF

PortraitVlogging

6 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

GR III wins 1 categories·GR IV HDF wins 3 categories
  • BGR IV HDF has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 102,400)
  • BGR IV HDF has higher Battery life (CIPA) (250 shots vs 200 shots)
  • BGR IV HDF has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 24.24 MP)
  • AGR III has lower Weight (257 g vs 262 g)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIIGR IV HDF
Resolution24.24 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max102,400204,800
Burst4 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISYesYes
Weight257 g262 g
Battery200 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

GR III is 1mm taller and 1mm thicker than GR IV HDF.

GR III is 5 g lighter than GR IV HDF.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR III · 33mm GR IV HDF

Sensor size, to scale

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR IV HDF

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIIGR IV HDF
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited
2.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
2.0Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
6.5Good
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 61.9, 33.2

  • Weight

    257 g vs 262 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV HDF

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 61.1, 32.7

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 102,400 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    250 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 24.24 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 4 fps
  • Burst (electronic)Both 4 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

GR IV HDF

Pros

  • Built-in HDF effect
  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis SR
  • 53GB internal memory

Cons

  • No ND filter
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR III and GR IV HDF at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR III
GR IV HDF
Resolution
24.24 MP
25.74 MP+6%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
GR III
GR IV HDF
AF system
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
49
49
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
No
Subject recognition
Face, Eye
Face, Eye
GR III
GR IV HDF
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
4 fps
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
GR III
GR IV HDF
Max resolution
Full HD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
Standard profiles
Codecs
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
GR III
GR IV HDF
Weight
257 g−5 g less
262 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
109.4 × 61.9 × 33.2 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
No
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR III or GR IV HDF?

GR III scores 6.5/10 versus 6.5/10 for GR IV HDF — 24.24MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR III and GR IV HDF?

GR III is 24.24 MP and GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV HDF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR III and GR IV HDF have in-body image stabilization?

GR III has in-body image stabilization, while gR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR III or the GR IV HDF?

GR III reaches 4 fps electronic. GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR III and GR IV HDF?

GR III weighs 257 g and GR IV HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR III is 5 g lighter.

Do the GR III and GR IV HDF record 4K video?

GR III: 4K up to 60p. GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p.

Are the GR III and GR IV HDF weather sealed?

GR III: No. GR IV HDF: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 200 shots (CIPA) for the GR III and 250 shots for the GR IV HDF, giving the GR IV HDF the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR III launched at $899 and GR IV HDF at $1,599. The GR III is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.