Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV HDF

Ricoh

GR IV HDF

GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.

$1,599

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

GR IV HDF is 1.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

GR IV HDF

PortraitVlogging

Wins

7categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV HDF wins 2 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AGR IV HDF has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 32,000)
  • AGR IV HDF has lower Weight (262 g vs 743 g)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

GR IV HDFAlpha 1 II
Resolution25.74 MP50.1 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max204,80032,000
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISYes8.5-stop
Weight262 g743 g
Battery250 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV HDF front view

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

GR IV HDF is 27mm narrower, 36mm shorter, and 50mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

GR IV HDF is 481 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV HDF · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV HDF back view

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV HDF top view

GR IV HDF

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV HDF

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR IV HDF: mount data unavailable

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IV HDFAlpha 1 II
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.0Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.0Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV HDF

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 743 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    520 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV HDF

Pros

  • Built-in HDF effect
  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis SR
  • 53GB internal memory

Cons

  • No ND filter
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV HDF
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
25.74 MP
50.1 MP+95%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR IV HDF
Alpha 1 II
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
GR IV HDF
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
204,800+2.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
GR IV HDF
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, GR IV HDF or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV HDF — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II?

GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR IV HDF or the Alpha 1 II?

GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II?

GR IV HDF weighs 262 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the GR IV HDF is 481 g lighter.

Do the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR IV HDF and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

GR IV HDF: No. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV HDF and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV HDF launched at $1,599 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The GR IV HDF is $4,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR IV HDF vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.