Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Ricoh
GR IV HDF
GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jan 2026
GR IV HDF is 3.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
GR IV HDF
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 250 shots)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)
- BGR IV HDF has lower Weight (262 g vs 670 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GR IV HDF
109 × 61 × 33 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 56mm thicker than GR IV HDF.
EOS R6 Mark II is 408 g heavier than GR IV HDF.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 33mm GR IV HDF
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IV HDF
109 × 61 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
GR IV HDF
109 × 33 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
GR IV HDF
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
GR IV HDF: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds H.265, H.264
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
GR IV HDF
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
Weight
262 g vs 670 g — lower is better
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 102,400 — higher is better
Resolution
25.74 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
GR IV HDF
Pros
- ✓Built-in HDF effect
- ✓25.74MP APS-C sensor
- ✓5-axis SR
- ✓53GB internal memory
Cons
- –No ND filter
- –Fixed lens
- –Full HD video only
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Ricoh GR IV HDF
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GR IV HDF?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV HDF — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV HDF captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GR IV HDF?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and GR IV HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR IV HDF is 408 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV HDF weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GR IV HDF: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 250 shots for the GR IV HDF, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GR IV HDF at $1,599. The GR IV HDF is $900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs GR IV HDF vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.