Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV HDF

Ricoh

GR IV HDF

GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.

$1,599

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Released within a month of each other.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

GR IV HDF

PortraitVlogging

Wins

7categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV HDF wins 2 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 49)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AGR IV HDF has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 51,200)
  • AGR IV HDF has lower Weight (262 g vs 695 g)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Battery life (CIPA) (630 shots vs 250 shots)

Key specs at a glance

GR IV HDFAlpha 7 V
Resolution25.74 MP33 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max204,80051,200
Burst4 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISYes7.5-stop
Weight262 g695 g
Battery250 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV HDF front view

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

GR IV HDF is 21mm narrower, 35mm shorter, and 50mm thinner than Alpha 7 V.

GR IV HDF is 433 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV HDF · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV HDF back view

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV HDF top view

GR IV HDF

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV HDF

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GR IV HDF: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IV HDFAlpha 7 V
Portrait
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
1.0Limited
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV HDF

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 695 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    630 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV HDF

Pros

  • Built-in HDF effect
  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis SR
  • 53GB internal memory

Cons

  • No ND filter
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV HDF
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
25.74 MP
33 MP+28%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
GR IV HDF
Alpha 7 V
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
GR IV HDF
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
204,800+2 stops
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
GR IV HDF
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
GR IV HDF
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
49
75915.5× more
AF frame coverage
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Face, Eye
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GR IV HDF or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR IV HDF — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V?

GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR IV HDF or the Alpha 7 V?

GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V?

GR IV HDF weighs 262 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the GR IV HDF is 433 g lighter.

Do the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the GR IV HDF and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

GR IV HDF: No. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV HDF and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV HDF launched at $1,599 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The GR IV HDF is $1,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.