Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

vs

Ricoh

GR IV HDF

GR IV variant with built-in Highlight Diffusion Filter for softer rendering and the same 25.74MP APS-C pocket platform.

$1,599

Released Jan 2026

GR IV HDF is 2.6 years newer.

Wins

4categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

2categories

GR IV HDF

PortraitVlogging

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 3 categories·GR IV HDF wins 2 categories
  • AQ3 has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV HDF has lower Weight (262 g vs 743 g)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 25.74 MP)
  • BGR IV HDF has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 100,000)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)

Key specs at a glance

Q3GR IV HDF
Resolution60.3 MP25.74 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max100,000204,800
Burst15 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight743 g262 g
Battery350 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

GR IV HDF

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Q3 is 21mm wider, 19mm taller, and 59mm thicker than GR IV HDF.

Q3 is 481 g heavier than GR IV HDF.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 33mm GR IV HDF

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

GR IV HDF

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3GR IV HDF
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
4.5Fair✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 25.74 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Q3 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

Reasons to choose

GR IV HDF

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    262 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 100,000 — higher is better

  • In-body stabilization

    Only GR IV HDF supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 4 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

GR IV HDF

Pros

  • Built-in HDF effect
  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis SR
  • 53GB internal memory

Cons

  • No ND filter
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and GR IV HDF at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
GR IV HDF
Resolution
60.3 MP2.3× more
25.74 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
Q3
GR IV HDF
AF system
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
49
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Face, Eye
Q3
GR IV HDF
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps
4 fps
Burst (electronic)
15 fps3.8× more
4 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
Q3
GR IV HDF
Max resolution
8K
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
L-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Q3
GR IV HDF
Weight
743 g
262 g−481 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
130 × 80 × 92 mm
109.4 × 61.1 × 32.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or GR IV HDF?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for GR IV HDF — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and GR IV HDF?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and GR IV HDF is 25.74 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and GR IV HDF have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while gR IV HDF has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the GR IV HDF?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. GR IV HDF reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and GR IV HDF?

Q3 weighs 743 g and GR IV HDF weighs 262 g, so the GR IV HDF is 481 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and GR IV HDF record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. GR IV HDF: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and GR IV HDF weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. GR IV HDF: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 250 shots for the GR IV HDF, giving the Q3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and GR IV HDF at $1,599. The GR IV HDF is $4,396 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.