Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Lumix S9

Panasonic

Lumix S9

Compact full-frame L-mount for creators with LUT and social-first features.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2024

vs
Alpha 7C II

Sony

Alpha 7C II

Compact 33MP full-frame with AI AF, 4K 60p, and travel-friendly body.

$2,199

Launch price

Released Oct 2023

Lumix S9 is 7 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

Lumix S9

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

6categories

Alpha 7C II

PortraitTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix S9 wins 2 categories·Alpha 7C II wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7C II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • ALumix S9 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 44 frames)
  • ALumix S9 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 10 fps)
  • BAlpha 7C II has higher 4K max frame rate (59.94 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • BAlpha 7C II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix S9Alpha 7C II
Resolution24.2 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps10 fps
4K29.97 fps59.94 fps
IBIS5-stop7-stop
Weight486 g514 g
Battery470 shots530 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix S9 front view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 × 47 mm

486 g (1.07 lb / 17.14 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7C II front view

Alpha 7C II

124 × 71 × 63 mm

514 g (1.13 lb / 18.13 oz)

Lumix S9 is 17mm thinner than Alpha 7C II but it is also 2mm wider and 3mm taller.

Lumix S9 is 28 g lighter than Alpha 7C II.

Depth (front-to-back): 47mm Lumix S9 · 63mm Alpha 7C II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix S9 back view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7C II back view

Alpha 7C II

124 × 71 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix S9 top view

Lumix S9

126 × 47 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7C II top view

Alpha 7C II

124 × 63 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix S9

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Alpha 7C II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix S9: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7C II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix S9Alpha 7C II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good
6.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.0Good
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix S9

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126, 73.9, 46.7

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 44 frames — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye, Car…

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

  • Weight

    486 g vs 514 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7C II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 124, 71.1, 63.4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Insect, Car/Train…

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7C II supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    59.94 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7C II supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Alpha 7C II supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix S9

Pros

  • Ultra compact FF
  • Creator LUT features
  • Open gate

Cons

  • No EVF
  • Single slot
  • Limited pro controls

Alpha 7C II

Pros

  • Compact full-frame
  • 33MP sensor
  • AI subject recognition
  • 4K 60p

Cons

  • Small grip
  • Single card slot
  • Micro HDMI

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix S9
Alpha 7C II
Resolution
24.2 MP
33 MP+36%
Sensor type
CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.6 x 23.8 mm
35.9 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Lumix S9
Alpha 7C II
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Lumix S9
Alpha 7C II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
Lumix S9
Alpha 7C II
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
N/A
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Lumix S9 or Alpha 7C II?

Lumix S9 scores 9.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for Alpha 7C II — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II?

Lumix S9 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7C II is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7C II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix S9 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7C II has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix S9 or the Alpha 7C II?

Lumix S9 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7C II reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II?

Lumix S9 weighs 486 g and Alpha 7C II weighs 514 g, so the Lumix S9 is 28 g lighter.

Do the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II record 4K video?

Lumix S9: 4K up to 29.97p. Alpha 7C II: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the Lumix S9 and Alpha 7C II weather sealed?

Lumix S9: Yes. Alpha 7C II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 470 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix S9 and 530 shots for the Alpha 7C II, giving the Alpha 7C II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix S9 launched at $1,499 and Alpha 7C II at $2,199. The Lumix S9 is $700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Lumix S9 vs Alpha 7C II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed August 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.