Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Lumix S9

Panasonic

Lumix S9

Compact full-frame L-mount for creators with LUT and social-first features.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2024

Lumix S9 is 1.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

Lumix S9

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Lumix S9 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix S9
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight670 g486 g
Battery760 shots470 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix S9 front view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 × 47 mm

486 g (1.07 lb / 17.14 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 25mm taller, and 42mm thicker than Lumix S9.

EOS R6 Mark II is 184 g heavier than Lumix S9.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 47mm Lumix S9

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S9 back view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix S9 top view

Lumix S9

126 × 47 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix S9

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix S9: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix S9
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
9.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S9

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126, 73.9, 46.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    486 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix S9

Pros

  • Ultra compact FF
  • Creator LUT features
  • Open gate

Cons

  • No EVF
  • Single slot
  • Limited pro controls

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S9
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S9
Processor
DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S9
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S9
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
N/A
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix S9?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Lumix S9 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix S9 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix S9?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix S9 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Lumix S9 weighs 486 g, so the Lumix S9 is 184 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix S9: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S9 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix S9: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 470 shots for the Lumix S9, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix S9 at $1,499. The Lumix S9 is $1,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Lumix S9 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.