Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Lumix S9

Panasonic

Lumix S9

Compact full-frame L-mount for creators with LUT and social-first features.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2024

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2024

Alpha 1 II is 6 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

Lumix S9

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

6categories

Alpha 1 II

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Lumix S9 wins 0 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

Lumix S9Alpha 1 II
Resolution24.2 MP50.1 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K29.97 fps120 fps
IBIS5-stop8.5-stop
Weight486 g743 g
Battery470 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Lumix S9 front view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 × 47 mm

486 g (1.07 lb / 17.14 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Lumix S9 is 10mm narrower, 23mm shorter, and 36mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

Lumix S9 is 257 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 47mm Lumix S9 · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Lumix S9 back view

Lumix S9

126 × 74 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Lumix S9 top view

Lumix S9

126 × 47 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 1 II

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Lumix S9

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Lumix S9: mount data unavailable

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseLumix S9Alpha 1 II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
6.0Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Lumix S9

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126, 73.9, 46.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye, Car…

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    486 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Insect, Car/Train…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Resolution

    50.1 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • RAW buffer depthBoth 200 frames
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Lumix S9

Pros

  • Ultra compact FF
  • Creator LUT features
  • Open gate

Cons

  • No EVF
  • Single slot
  • Limited pro controls

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Lumix S9
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
50.1 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.6 x 23.8 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Lumix S9
Alpha 1 II
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Lumix S9
Alpha 1 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
Lumix S9
Alpha 1 II
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
N/A
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Lumix S9 or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Lumix S9 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II?

Lumix S9 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Lumix S9 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Lumix S9 or the Alpha 1 II?

Lumix S9 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II?

Lumix S9 weighs 486 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the Lumix S9 is 257 g lighter.

Do the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

Lumix S9: 4K up to 29.97p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Lumix S9 and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

Lumix S9: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 470 shots (CIPA) for the Lumix S9 and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Lumix S9 launched at $1,499 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The Lumix S9 is $5,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Lumix S9 vs Alpha 1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Panasonic and Sony press materials.