Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Pentax

K-1

Original 36MP full-frame Pentax DSLR with 5-axis SR, AA filter simulator, and weather sealing.

$1,799

Launch price

Released Apr 2016

vs

Pentax

K-3 II

24MP APS-C DSLR with pixel shift resolution, GPS, and no AA filter for detail-focused work.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

K-1 is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

K-1

WildlifePortrait

Wins

2categories

K-3 II

WildlifeTravel

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

K-1 wins 4 categories·K-3 II wins 1 categories
  • AK-1 has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AK-1 has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AK-1 has higher Resolution (36.4 MP vs 24.4 MP)
  • BK-3 II has lower Weight (700 g vs 1010 g)
  • AK-1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

K-1K-3 II
Resolution36.4 MP24.4 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS5-stop6-stop
Weight1010 g700 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-1

137 × 111 × 87 mm

1010 g (2.23 lb / 35.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 II

132 × 102 × 78 mm

700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)

K-1 is 6mm wider, 9mm taller, and 9mm thicker than K-3 II.

K-1 is 310 g heavier than K-3 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm K-1 · 78mm K-3 II

Sensor size, to scale

K-1

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

K-3 II

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-1

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

K-3 II

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-1K-3 II
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-1

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137, 110.5, 86.5

  • AA filter

    Only K-1 supports it

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    36.4 MP vs 24.4 MP — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.5, 101.5, 77.5

  • Weight

    700 g vs 1010 g — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 101
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-1

Pros

  • 36MP full-frame
  • IBIS in DSLR
  • AA filter simulator
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Slow AF vs mirrorless
  • Heavy
  • Superseded by K-1 II

K-3 II

Pros

  • Pixel shift hi-res
  • No AA filter
  • GPS built-in
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Superseded by K-3 III
  • DSLR
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the K-1 and K-3 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

K-1
K-3 II
Resolution
36.4 MP+49%
24.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 24.0 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
K-1
K-3 II
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
K-1
K-3 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
K-1
K-3 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, K-1 or K-3 II?

K-1 scores 7.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for K-3 II — 36.4MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the K-1 and K-3 II?

K-1 is 36.4 MP and K-3 II is 24.4 MP, so the K-1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-1 and K-3 II have in-body image stabilization?

K-1 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-3 II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-1 or the K-3 II?

K-1 reaches 20 fps electronic. K-3 II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-1 and K-3 II?

K-1 weighs 1010 g and K-3 II weighs 700 g, so the K-3 II is 310 g lighter.

Do the K-1 and K-3 II record 4K video?

K-1: 4K up to 60p. K-3 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the K-1 and K-3 II weather sealed?

K-1: Yes. K-3 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-1 and 640 shots for the K-3 II, giving the K-3 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-1 launched at $1,799 and K-3 II at $1,099. The K-3 II is $700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way K-1 vs K-3 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.