Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Apr 2021

vs

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

K-3 Mark III is 2.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

Wins

2categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

K-3 Mark III wins 3 categories·GR III wins 2 categories
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 200 shots)
  • AK-3 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (101 vs 49)
  • BGR III has lower Weight (257 g vs 520 g)

Key specs at a glance

K-3 Mark IIIGR III
Resolution25.7 MP24.24 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst20 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopYes
Weight520 g257 g
Battery640 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

K-3 Mark III is 29mm wider, 36mm taller, and 55mm thicker than GR III.

K-3 Mark III is 263 g heavier than GR III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm K-3 Mark III · 33mm GR III

Sensor size, to scale

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

K-3 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

GR III: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseK-3 Mark IIIGR III
Portrait
6.5Good
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.0Good✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    101 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only K-3 Mark III supports it

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Weight

    257 g vs 520 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the K-3 Mark III and GR III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

K-3 Mark III
GR III
Resolution
25.7 MP+6%
24.24 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 × 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
K-3 Mark III
GR III
Processor
Image processor
GR ENGINE 6
K-3 Mark III
GR III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
K-3 Mark III
GR III
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec
K-3 Mark III
GR III
AF system
SAFOX 12
Hybrid AF (image-plane phase detection + contrast detection)
AF points / zones
1012.1× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Face, Eye

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, K-3 Mark III or GR III?

K-3 Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for GR III — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the K-3 Mark III and GR III?

K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP and GR III is 24.24 MP, so the K-3 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the K-3 Mark III and GR III have in-body image stabilization?

K-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR III has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the K-3 Mark III or the GR III?

K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. GR III reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the K-3 Mark III and GR III?

K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g and GR III weighs 257 g, so the GR III is 263 g lighter.

Do the K-3 Mark III and GR III record 4K video?

K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p. GR III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the K-3 Mark III and GR III weather sealed?

K-3 Mark III: Yes. GR III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the K-3 Mark III and 200 shots for the GR III, giving the K-3 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

K-3 Mark III launched at $1,999 and GR III at $899. The GR III is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.