Sigma
BF
Minimalist full-frame L-mount body with large top screen and unique design.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Apr 2024
Sigma
sd Quattro H
Foveon sensor APS-H body with unique color rendering for stills purists.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Mar 2016
BF is 8.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
BF
Wins
sd Quattro H
16 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- Bsd Quattro H has higher Resolution (44.8 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- Bsd Quattro H has lower Weight (520 g vs 720 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareBF
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
sd Quattro H
138 × 98 × 88 mm
520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)
BF and sd Quattro H share virtually identical body dimensions.
BF is 200 g heavier than sd Quattro H.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm BF · 88mm sd Quattro H
Sensor size, to scale
BF
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
sd Quattro H
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
BF
AA filter
Only BF supports it
Reasons to choose
sd Quattro H
Resolution
44.8 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Weight
520 g vs 720 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 25,600
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 49
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 90 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
BF
Pros
- ✓Unique design
- ✓Full-frame
- ✓L-mount
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Niche ergonomics
- –Limited controls
sd Quattro H
Pros
- ✓Unique Foveon color
- ✓High detail per pixel
- ✓Distinct look
Cons
- –Slow operation
- –Poor low light
- –Limited lens range
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the BF and sd Quattro H at major authorized retailers.
Sigma sd Quattro H
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for vlogging, BF or sd Quattro H?
sd Quattro H scores 7.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for BF — 4K 60p for smooth handheld vlogs.
What's the resolution difference between the BF and sd Quattro H?
BF is 24.2 MP and sd Quattro H is 44.8 MP, so the sd Quattro H captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the BF and sd Quattro H have in-body image stabilization?
BF has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while sd Quattro H has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the BF or the sd Quattro H?
BF reaches 15 fps electronic. sd Quattro H reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the BF and sd Quattro H?
BF weighs 720 g and sd Quattro H weighs 520 g, so the sd Quattro H is 200 g lighter.
Do the BF and sd Quattro H record 4K video?
BF: 4K up to 60p. sd Quattro H: 4K up to 60p.
Are the BF and sd Quattro H weather sealed?
BF: Yes. sd Quattro H: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the BF and 640 shots for the sd Quattro H, giving the sd Quattro H the edge.
How much does each cost?
BF launched at $1,999 and sd Quattro H at $1,299. The sd Quattro H is $700 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way BF vs sd Quattro H vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.