Sigma
BF
Minimalist full-frame L-mount body with large top screen and unique design.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Apr 2024
Sigma
fp
Minimalist full-frame box camera for creative stills and video.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
BF is 4.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
BF
Wins
fp
15 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ABF has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
- ABF has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- ABF has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 11 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareBF
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
fp
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
BF and fp share virtually identical body dimensions.
BF and fp weigh the same.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm BF · 88mm fp
Sensor size, to scale
BF
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
fp
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
BF
IBIS effectiveness
6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Animal / bird AF
Only BF supports it
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only BF supports it
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only BF supports it
Weather sealing
Only BF supports it
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
Touchscreen
Only BF supports it
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only BF supports it
Reasons to choose
fp
No major advantages on measured specs.
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 25,600
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 49
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 90 %
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
BF
Pros
- ✓Unique design
- ✓Full-frame
- ✓L-mount
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Niche ergonomics
- –Limited controls
fp
Pros
- ✓Ultra compact
- ✓L-mount
- ✓Unique concept
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –24MP
- –Poor ergonomics for long shoots
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the BF and fp at major authorized retailers.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, BF or fp?
BF scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for fp — 15fps burst — fast action ready.
What's the resolution difference between the BF and fp?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the BF and fp have in-body image stabilization?
BF has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the BF or the fp?
BF reaches 15 fps electronic. fp reaches 11 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the BF and fp?
Both bodies weigh roughly 720 g.
Do the BF and fp record 4K video?
BF: 4K up to 60p. fp: 4K up to 60p.
Are the BF and fp weather sealed?
BF: Yes. fp: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the BF and 640 shots for the fp, giving the fp the edge.
How much does each cost?
BF launched at $1,999 and fp at $1,899. The fp is $100 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way BF vs fp vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.