Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sigma

fp

Minimalist full-frame box camera for creative stills and video.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

vs
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

fp L is 2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

fp

Portrait

Wins

3categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

fp wins 3 categories·fp L wins 2 categories
  • Bfp L has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
  • Afp has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 12 frames)
  • Afp has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 240 shots)
  • Bfp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • Afp has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)

Key specs at a glance

fpfp L
Resolution24.2 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst11 fps10 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight720 g427 g
Battery640 shots240 shots

Size and weight, to scale

fp

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

fp is 25mm wider, 28mm taller, and 43mm thicker than fp L.

fp is 293 g heavier than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm fp · 45mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

fp

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

fp

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

fp

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casefpfp L
Portrait
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
4.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

fp

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 12 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 240 shots — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • Burst (electronic)

    11 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only fp L supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only fp L supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • AF frame coverageBoth 90 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

fp

Pros

  • Ultra compact
  • L-mount
  • Unique concept

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • 24MP
  • Poor ergonomics for long shoots

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the fp and fp L at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

fp
fp L
Resolution
24.2 MP
61 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24
AA filter
Yes
Yes
fp
fp L
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
fp
fp L
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
fp
fp L
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, fp or fp L?

fp L scores 6.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for fp — 10fps burst — solid for most action.

What's the resolution difference between the fp and fp L?

fp is 24.2 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the fp and fp L?

fp does not have IBIS, while fp L does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the fp or the fp L?

fp reaches 11 fps electronic. fp L reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the fp and fp L?

fp weighs 720 g and fp L weighs 427 g, so the fp L is 293 g lighter.

Do the fp and fp L record 4K video?

fp: 4K up to 60p. fp L: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the fp and fp L weather sealed?

fp: No. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the fp and 240 shots for the fp L, giving the fp the edge.

How much does each cost?

fp launched at $1,899 and fp L at $2,499. The fp is $600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way fp vs fp L vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sigma press materials.