Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sigma

BF

Minimalist full-frame L-mount body with large top screen and unique design.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Apr 2024

vs
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

BF is 2.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

BF

WildlifePortrait

Wins

2categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

BF wins 4 categories·fp L wins 1 categories
  • ABF has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 12 frames)
  • ABF has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 240 shots)
  • Bfp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • ABF has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • ABF has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

BFfp L
Resolution24.2 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst15 fps10 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBIS6-stopNo
Weight720 g427 g
Battery640 shots240 shots

Size and weight, to scale

BF

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

BF is 25mm wider, 28mm taller, and 43mm thicker than fp L.

BF is 293 g heavier than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm BF · 45mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

BF

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

BF

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

BF

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseBFfp L
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

BF

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 12 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 240 shots — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only BF supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

  • Weight

    427 g vs 720 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • AF frame coverageBoth 90 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

BF

Pros

  • Unique design
  • Full-frame
  • L-mount

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Niche ergonomics
  • Limited controls

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the BF and fp L at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

BF
fp L
Resolution
24.2 MP
61 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24
AA filter
Yes
Yes
BF
fp L
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
BF
fp L
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
BF
fp L
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, BF or fp L?

BF scores 6.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for fp L — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the BF and fp L?

BF is 24.2 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the BF and fp L have in-body image stabilization?

BF has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp L does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the BF or the fp L?

BF reaches 15 fps electronic. fp L reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the BF and fp L?

BF weighs 720 g and fp L weighs 427 g, so the fp L is 293 g lighter.

Do the BF and fp L record 4K video?

BF: 4K up to 60p. fp L: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the BF and fp L weather sealed?

BF: Yes. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the BF and 240 shots for the fp L, giving the BF the edge.

How much does each cost?

BF launched at $1,999 and fp L at $2,499. The BF is $500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way BF vs fp L vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sigma press materials.