Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

vs
sd Quattro

Sigma

sd Quattro

Foveon APS-C body delivering exceptional per-pixel detail for stills purists.

$999

Launch price

Released Feb 2016

fp L is 5.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

Wins

5categories

sd Quattro

WildlifeTravel

8 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

fp L wins 3 categories·sd Quattro wins 2 categories
  • Afp L has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 9)
  • Bsd Quattro has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 12 frames)
  • Afp L has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 6,400)
  • Bsd Quattro has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 240 shots)
  • Afp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 29 MP)

Key specs at a glance

fp Lsd Quattro
Resolution61 MP29 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max25,6006,400
Burst10 fps15 fps
4K29.97 fps60 fps
IBISNo6-stop
Weight427 g625 g
Battery240 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

sd Quattro front view

sd Quattro

147 × 95 × 91 mm

625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz)

fp L is 34mm narrower, 25mm shorter, and 46mm thinner than sd Quattro.

fp L is 198 g lighter than sd Quattro.

Depth (front-to-back): 45mm fp L · 91mm sd Quattro

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

sd Quattro back view

sd Quattro

147 × 95 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

sd Quattro top view

sd Quattro

147 × 91 mm

Sensor size, to scale

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

sd Quattro

23.5 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

364 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casefp Lsd Quattro
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 29 MP — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only fp L supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

Reasons to choose

sd Quattro

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 147, 95.1, 90.8

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 12 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 240 shots — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only sd Quattro supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.09 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 90 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

sd Quattro

Pros

  • Unique Foveon color
  • High acutance
  • Distinct rendering

Cons

  • Slow
  • Poor high ISO
  • SA mount limited

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the fp L and sd Quattro at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

fp L
sd Quattro
Resolution
61 MP2.1× more
29 MP
Sensor type
BSI CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24
23.5 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
fp L
sd Quattro
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
fp L
sd Quattro
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600+2 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
fp L
sd Quattro
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, fp L or sd Quattro?

fp L scores 7.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for sd Quattro — 61MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the fp L and sd Quattro?

fp L is 61 MP and sd Quattro is 29 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the fp L and sd Quattro have in-body image stabilization?

fp L does not have IBIS, while sd Quattro has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the fp L or the sd Quattro?

fp L reaches 10 fps electronic. sd Quattro reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the fp L and sd Quattro?

fp L weighs 427 g and sd Quattro weighs 625 g, so the fp L is 198 g lighter.

Do the fp L and sd Quattro record 4K video?

fp L: 4K up to 29.97p. sd Quattro: 4K up to 60p.

Are the fp L and sd Quattro weather sealed?

fp L: Yes. sd Quattro: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 240 shots (CIPA) for the fp L and 640 shots for the sd Quattro, giving the sd Quattro the edge.

How much does each cost?

fp L launched at $2,499 and sd Quattro at $999. The sd Quattro is $1,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way fp L vs sd Quattro vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sigma press materials.