Sigma
FP2
Pocket-sized L-Mount full-frame body with a 24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps stills, 6K OpenGate / ProRes RAW video, 70GB internal storage, and a Still/Cine mode switch.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2026
Sigma
sd Quattro one
Latest Foveon APS-C body with 61MP-equivalent detail, unique color rendering, and weather sealing.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Mar 2024
FP2 is 2.7 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FP2
Wins
sd Quattro one
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- Bsd Quattro one has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 0 fps)
- Bsd Quattro one has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
- AFP2 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AFP2 has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- Bsd Quattro one has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 24.5 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
FP2
112 × 71 × 41 mm
460 g (1.01 lb / 16.23 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
sd Quattro one
114 × 70 × 60 mm
625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz)
FP2 is 2mm narrower and 19mm thinner than sd Quattro one but it is also 1mm taller.
FP2 is 165 g lighter than sd Quattro one.
Depth (front-to-back): 41mm FP2 · 60mm sd Quattro one
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
FP2
112 × 71 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
sd Quattro one
114 × 70 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
FP2
112 × 41 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
sd Quattro one
114 × 60 mm
Sensor size, to scale
FP2
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
sd Quattro one
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
FP2
Subject recognition
Adds Animals, Birds, People
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 112, 71, 41
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only FP2 supports it
Codecs
Adds ProRes RAW, ProRes RAW HQ
Weight
460 g vs 625 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
sd Quattro one
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better
IBIS effectiveness
6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 113.9, 69.9, 59.9
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
Resolution
61 MP vs 24.5 MP — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only sd Quattro one supports it
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only sd Quattro one supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Microphone jack (3.5mm) — Both support microphone jack (3.5mm)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FP2
Pros
- ✓World's smallest full-frame body (376g body only)
- ✓24.5MP partially stacked sensor, 20fps electronic burst
- ✓6K OpenGate + ProRes RAW HQ, L-Log, 32-bit float audio
- ✓70GB internal storage + SD UHS-II + USB SSD
- ✓Tilting 3.15" LCD, dust/splash resistant, modular EVF-21
Cons
- –No in-body image stabilization (EIS in video only)
- –No built-in EVF — optional EVF-21 sold separately
- –Electronic shutter only
- –No headphone jack (USB audio only)
sd Quattro one
Pros
- ✓Unique Foveon color science
- ✓61MP-equivalent detail
- ✓Weather sealed
- ✓Distinct stills look
Cons
- –Slow operation
- –Limited SA lens line
- –Poor high ISO
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FP2 and sd Quattro one at major authorized retailers.
Sigma sd Quattro one
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, FP2 or sd Quattro one?
sd Quattro one scores 9.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for FP2 — Bird AF subject recognition.
What's the resolution difference between the FP2 and sd Quattro one?
FP2 is 24.5 MP and sd Quattro one is 61 MP, so the sd Quattro one captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the FP2 and sd Quattro one have in-body image stabilization?
FP2 does not have IBIS, while sd Quattro one has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the FP2 or the sd Quattro one?
FP2 reaches 20 fps electronic. sd Quattro one reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the FP2 and sd Quattro one?
FP2 weighs 460 g and sd Quattro one weighs 625 g, so the FP2 is 165 g lighter.
Do the FP2 and sd Quattro one record 4K video?
FP2: 4K up to 59.94p. sd Quattro one: 4K up to 60p.
Are the FP2 and sd Quattro one weather sealed?
FP2: Yes. sd Quattro one: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 370 shots (CIPA) for the FP2 and 640 shots for the sd Quattro one, giving the sd Quattro one the edge.
How much does each cost?
FP2 launched at $2,199 and sd Quattro one at $2,499. The FP2 is $300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way FP2 vs sd Quattro one vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of Sigma press materials.