Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Sigma
sd Quattro one
Latest Foveon APS-C body with 61MP-equivalent detail, unique color rendering, and weather sealing.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Mar 2024
sd Quattro one is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
sd Quattro one
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- Bsd Quattro one has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 24.2 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
sd Quattro one
114 × 70 × 60 mm
625 g (1.38 lb / 22.05 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 25mm wider, 29mm taller, and 29mm thicker than sd Quattro one.
EOS R6 Mark II is 45 g heavier than sd Quattro one.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 60mm sd Quattro one
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
sd Quattro one
114 × 70 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
sd Quattro one
114 × 60 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
sd Quattro one
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
sd Quattro one: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
sd Quattro one
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 113.9, 69.9, 59.9
Resolution
61 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Weight
625 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
sd Quattro one
Pros
- ✓Unique Foveon color science
- ✓61MP-equivalent detail
- ✓Weather sealed
- ✓Distinct stills look
Cons
- –Slow operation
- –Limited SA lens line
- –Poor high ISO
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Sigma sd Quattro one
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or sd Quattro one?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for sd Quattro one — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and sd Quattro one is 61 MP, so the sd Quattro one captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while sd Quattro one has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the sd Quattro one?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. sd Quattro one reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and sd Quattro one weighs 625 g, so the sd Quattro one is 45 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. sd Quattro one: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and sd Quattro one weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. sd Quattro one: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the sd Quattro one, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
Both launched at $2,499.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs sd Quattro one vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.