Canon
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Canon RF Mount
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM — 24mm f/1.8 for Canon RF, a popular choice in the canon lineup.
$499
Launch priceReleased Sep 2020
Canon
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM is 11 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Wins
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BRF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- ARF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM has lower Min focus distance (14 cm vs 70 cm)
- ARF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM has lower Weight (270 g vs 1070 g)
- ARF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM has lower Length (63.1 mm vs 146 mm)
- ARF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM has higher Max magnification (0.5 × vs 0.23 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareRF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
⌀74 × 63 mm
270 g (0.60 lb / 9.52 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
⌀90 × 146 mm
1070 g (2.36 lb / 37.74 oz)
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM is 83mm shorter and 16mm narrower than RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM.
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM is 800 g lighter than RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
- ✓
Min focus distance
14 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
270 g vs 1070 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
63.1 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Internal focus
Only RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.8 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.8 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.5 × vs 0.23 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super UD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Canon RF mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
- ✓Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
- ✓Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
- ✓Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
- ✓Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization
Cons
- –Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
- –Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
- –Vignetting is quite heavy wide open
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM and RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 24mm F1.8 Macro IS STM
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.