Canon
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF Mount
An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
Canon
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
Canon RF Mount
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM — 18–150mm f/3.5-6.3 for Canon RF, a popular choice in the canon lineup.
$329
Launch priceReleased May 2022
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM is 2.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Wins
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BRF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM has lower Min focus distance (17 cm vs 70 cm)
- BRF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM has lower Weight (310 g vs 1070 g)
- ARF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/6.3)
- BRF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM has higher Max magnification (0.44 × vs 0.23 ×)
- BRF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM has lower Length (83.8 mm vs 146 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareRF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
⌀90 × 146 mm
1070 g (2.36 lb / 37.74 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
⌀69 × 84 mm
310 g (0.68 lb / 10.93 oz)
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM is 62mm longer and 21mm wider than RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM.
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM is 760 g heavier than RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Super UD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/6.3 — lower is better
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 4.5 stops — higher is better
Reasons to choose the RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
- ✓
Min focus distance
17 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
310 g vs 1070 g — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 PMo
- ✓
Internal focus
Only RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM supports it
- ✓
Length
83.8 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68.6 mm vs 90 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.44 × vs 0.23 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Pros
- ✓Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
- ✓Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
- ✓Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
- ✓Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
- ✓Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization
Cons
- –Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
- –Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
- –Vignetting is quite heavy wide open
RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM and RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
Canon RF-S 18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.