Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM

Canon RF Mount

An incredibly compact, extending telephoto zoom with L-series optics and 5 stops of stabilization.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Oct 2019

vs

Tamron

28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Sony E Mount

An incredibly popular third-party zoom updated with vastly improved sharpness and autofocus.

$899

Launch price

Released Aug 2021

28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 1.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

5categories

28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Sports & Action

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM wins 1 categories·28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 wins 4 categories
  • ARF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Min focus distance (18 cm vs 70 cm)
  • B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Weight (540 g vs 1070 g)
  • B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has higher Max magnification (0.37 × vs 0.23 ×)
  • B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Length (118 mm vs 146 mm)

Key specs at a glance

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Focal Length70-200 mm28-75 mm
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
MountCanon RFSony E
CoverageFull FrameFull Frame
Stabilization5 stopsNo
Weight1070 g540 g
Min Focus70 cm18 cm
Filter Size77 mm67 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseRF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Portrait
7.5Good
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.0Good
4.0Fair
Landscape
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Travel
4.0Fair
3.5Limited
Wildlife
5.5Fair
3.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
1.5Limited
4.5Fair

The verdict

2.8 Di III VXD G2 if you prioritize portability and close-up versatility for everyday street or travel photography. It benefits from a lightweight 540g build and a significantly shorter 18cm minimum focus distance. (36 words)

Total: 19 + 38 + 36 = 93 words.

Check: "exactly 3 short paragraphs (use \n\n between paragraphs)". Yes. Check: "no markdown". Yes. Check: "no filler". Yes. Check: "90-115 words". Yes (93). Check: "hard cap 120". Yes.

Wait, "F2.8" vs "F2.8L". Canon: Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM Tamron: Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 Correct.

Wait, "1 Super UD", "1 UD", "2 Aspherical" etc. are in specs but I didn't use them. That's fine, I used other specs. "Dual Nano USM" vs "VXD Linear Motor". "Internal focus: false" for Canon, "true" for Tamron. "Max magnification: 0.23" vs "0.37".

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM

  • Special elements

    Adds 1 Super UD, 1 UD, 2 Aspherical

  • OIS effectiveness

    5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Optical stabilization

    Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it

  • Control ring

    Only RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM supports it

Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Special elements

    Adds 2 LD, 2 GM

  • Min focus distance

    18 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better

  • Internal focus

    Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it

  • Custom function button

    Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it

  • Weight

    540 g vs 1070 g — lower is better

  • Length

    118 mm vs 146 mm — lower is better

  • Diameter

    76 mm vs 90 mm — lower is better

  • Max magnification

    0.37 × vs 0.23 × — higher is better

Shared specifications

Max aperture (Wide)

Both f/2.8

Max aperture (Tele)

Both f/2.8

Weather sealing

Both support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM

Pros

  • Unbelievably compact storage size thanks to extending barrel
  • Very lightweight design (only 1070g)
  • Excellent center sharpness at all focal lengths
  • Dual Nano USM focus motors offer fast, silent AF
  • Exceptional 5-stop optical image stabilization

Cons

  • Extending barrel can draw in dust/moisture over time
  • Not compatible with RF teleconverters (due to rear element position)
  • Vignetting is quite heavy wide open

28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Pros

  • Superb value for money compared to first-party options
  • Excellent sharpness throughout the range, even at f/2.8
  • Very lightweight and compact (only 540g)
  • Fast VXD linear motor focus drive
  • Customizable lens functions via Tamron Lens Utility software

Cons

  • Starts at 28mm instead of the wider 24mm standard
  • Slightly weaker corner sharpness at 75mm wide open
  • Weather sealing is basic compared to Sony GM lenses

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM and 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 at major authorized retailers.

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM

Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Focal length (Min)
70 mm
28 mm
Focal length (Max)
200 mm
75 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8
f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8
f/2.8
Elements
17
17
Groups
13
15
Special elements
1 Super UD, 1 UD, 2 Aspherical
2 LD, 2 GM
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Min focus distance
70 cm
18 cm−52 cm less
Max magnification
0.23 ×
0.37 ×+61%
Autofocus motor
Dual Nano USM
VXD Linear Motor
Internal focus
No
Yes
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optical stabilization
Yes
No
OIS effectiveness
5 stops
0 stops
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Weight
1070 g
540 g−530 g less
Length
146 mm
118 mm−28 mm less
Diameter
90 mm
76 mm−14 mm less
Filter thread size
77 mm
67 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes
Diaphragm blades
9
9
RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Lens mount
Canon RF
Sony E
Format coverage
Full Frame
Full Frame

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.