Canon
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Canon RF Mount
The definitive portrait prime for RF — f/1.2 aperture delivers unmatched subject separation and dreamy backgrounds.
$2,699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2019
Canon
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
Canon RF Mount
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM — 10–18mm f/4.5-6.3 for Canon RF, a popular choice in the canon lineup.
$329
Launch priceReleased Apr 2024
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM is 5.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Wins
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
TL;DR — Key differences
- BRF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM has higher OIS effectiveness (4 stops vs 0 stops)
- BRF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM has lower Weight (165 g vs 1195 g)
- BRF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM has lower Min focus distance (15 cm vs 85 cm)
- ARF 85mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/6.3)
- ARF 85mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4.5)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
⌀103 × 117 mm
1195 g (2.63 lb / 42.15 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
⌀69 × 45 mm
165 g (0.36 lb / 5.82 oz)
RF 85mm F1.2L USM is 72mm longer and 34mm wider than RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM.
RF 85mm F1.2L USM is 1030 g heavier than RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 85mm F1.2L USM
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/6.3 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4.5 — lower is better
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only RF 85mm F1.2L USM supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only RF 85mm F1.2L USM supports it
Reasons to choose the RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
165 g vs 1195 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
15 cm vs 85 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
44.6 mm vs 117 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM supports it
- ✓
Diameter
69.2 mm vs 103 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.17 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Pros
- ✓Class-leading portrait focal length with f/1.2 aperture
- ✓Exceptional subject isolation and bokeh quality
- ✓Excellent eye-AF tracking on Canon R bodies
- ✓Premium L-series weather sealing
Cons
- –Very heavy (1195g) — tiring for handheld sessions
- –Expensive flagship pricing
- –No built-in stabilization
RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 85mm F1.2L USM and RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 85mm F1.2L USM
Canon RF-S 10-18mm F4.5-6.3 IS STM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.