Fujifilm
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR — 16–80mm f/4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Lightweight 40–150mm travel telephoto with F4 constant aperture and IP53 sealing.
$699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2020
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO is 7 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 70 cm)
- AXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.21 ×)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Weight (382 g vs 440 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has lower Length (99.9 mm vs 112 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
⌀65 × 112 mm
440 g (0.97 lb / 15.52 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
⌀69 × 100 mm
382 g (0.84 lb / 13.47 oz)
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR is 12mm longer and 4mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR is 58 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 68.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.21 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
Weight
382 g vs 440 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99.9 mm vs 112 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/4
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/4
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR and M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 R OIS WR
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.