Fujifilm
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR — 50–140mm f/2.8 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jun 2014
Fujifilm
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro — 60mm f/2.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$649
Launch priceReleased Jan 2012
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR is 2.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Weight (215 g vs 995 g)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.25 ×)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Length (80 mm vs 189 mm)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Min focus distance (28 cm vs 38 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
Reasons to choose the XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
- ✓
Weight
215 g vs 995 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
- ✓
Length
80 mm vs 189 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Diameter
Both 70 mm
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR and XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.