OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
50mm-equiv. F1.2 standard prime with 19-element design, 30 cm close focus, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Professional telephoto zoom with constant F2.8, dual linear AF, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Sep 2013
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 4.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Min focus distance (30 cm vs 140 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Weight (410 g vs 880 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO has higher Max magnification (0.21 × vs 0.11 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀70 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
⌀77 × 160 mm
880 g (1.94 lb / 31.04 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 73mm shorter and 7mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 470 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 140 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 1 DSA, 3 ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
410 g vs 880 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 160 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 77 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 2 Aspherical, 1 HD…
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.21 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.