Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

OM System

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

Micro Four Thirds Mount

600mm-equiv. F4 super-telephoto with Sync IS (6 stops), 1475g weight, removable rotating tripod collar, and PRO weather sealing.

$3,499

Launch price

Released Feb 2016

vs

OM System

M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

Micro Four Thirds Mount

Professional telephoto zoom with constant F2.8, dual linear AF, and IPX1 weather sealing.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2013

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 2.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

PortraitSports & Action

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO wins 1 categories·M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO wins 4 categories
  • AM.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (4 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO has lower Weight (880 g vs 1475 g)
  • BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
  • BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
  • BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO has lower Length (160 mm vs 227 mm)

Key specs at a glance

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PROM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Focal Length300 mm40-150 mm
Max Aperturef/4f/2.8
MountMicro Four ThirdsMicro Four Thirds
CoverageMicro Four ThirdsMicro Four Thirds
Stabilization4 stopsNo
Weight1475 g880 g
Min Focus140 cm140 cm
Filter Size77 mm77 mm

Size and weight, to scale

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO shown to scale

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

93 × 227 mm

1475 g (3.25 lb / 52.03 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

77 × 160 mm

880 g (1.94 lb / 31.04 oz)

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 67mm longer and 16mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO.

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 595 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO.

Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseM.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PROM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Portrait
2.5Limited
7.5Good
Sports & Action
7.0Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
5.0Fair
Landscape
4.0Fair
5.0Fair
Travel
2.0Limited
4.0Fair
Wildlife
7.5Good
3.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
1.5Limited
0.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

  • OIS effectiveness

    4 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Special elements

    Adds 3 Super ED, 3 HR

  • Optical stabilization

    Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO supports it

  • Max magnification

    0.24 × vs 0.21 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

  • Special elements

    Adds 1 Super ED, 2 ED, 2 Aspherical…

  • Weight

    880 g vs 1475 g — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Wide)

    f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Tele)

    f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better

  • Length

    160 mm vs 227 mm — lower is better

  • Diameter

    77 mm vs 92.5 mm — lower is better

Shared specifications

Min focus distance

Both 140 cm

Internal focus

Both support internal focus

Weather sealing

Both support weather sealing

Control ring

Both support control ring

Custom function button

Both support custom function button

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

Pros

  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Built-in optical image stabilization
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting

Cons

  • Premium price point
  • Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
  • Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance

M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

Pros

  • Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
  • Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility

Cons

  • No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO at major authorized retailers.

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO

OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Focal length (Min)
300 mm
40 mm
Focal length (Max)
300 mm
150 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/4
f/2.8+1 stop wider
Max aperture (Tele)
f/4
f/2.8+1 stop wider
Elements
17
16
Groups
10
10
Special elements
3 Super ED, 3 HR, 1 E-HR
1 Super ED, 2 ED, 2 Aspherical, 1 HD, 1 E-HR
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Min focus distance
140 cm
140 cm
Max magnification
0.24 ×+14%
0.21 ×
Autofocus motor
MSC (stepping motor)
Dual linear motors
Internal focus
Yes
Yes
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Optical stabilization
Yes
No
OIS effectiveness
4 stops
0 stops
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Weight
1475 g
880 g−595 g less
Length
227 mm
160 mm−67 mm less
Diameter
92.5 mm
77 mm−16 mm less
Filter thread size
77 mm
77 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes
Diaphragm blades
9
9
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F2.8 PRO
Lens mount
Micro Four Thirds
Micro Four Thirds
Format coverage
Micro Four Thirds
Micro Four Thirds

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.