OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
50mm-equiv. F1.2 standard prime with 19-element design, 30 cm close focus, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro — 60mm f/2.8 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$549
Launch priceReleased Aug 2019
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.11 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Weight (185 g vs 410 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro has lower Min focus distance (19 cm vs 30 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀70 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
⌀60 × 82 mm
185 g (0.41 lb / 6.53 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 5mm longer and 10mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 225 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 1 DSA, 3 ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO supports it
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
185 g vs 410 g — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
19 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
60 mm vs 70 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 87 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.