OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
50mm-equiv. F1.2 standard prime with 19-element design, 30 cm close focus, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Constant F2.8 ultra-wide zoom (14–28mm equiv.) with IPX1 sealing and 7.5cm close focus.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2015
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 2.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO has lower Min focus distance (7.5 cm vs 30 cm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Weight (410 g vs 534 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Length (87 mm vs 98 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀70 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
⌀78 × 98 mm
534 g (1.18 lb / 18.84 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 11mm shorter and 8mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 124 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 3 ED
- ✓
Weight
410 g vs 534 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 98 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 78 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
- ✓
Min focus distance
7.5 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical ED, 1 ED, 1 Super HR…
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO supports it
Shared specifications
Max magnification
Both 0.11 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.