OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
600mm-equiv. F4 super-telephoto with Sync IS (6 stops), 1475g weight, removable rotating tripod collar, and PRO weather sealing.
$3,499
Launch priceReleased Feb 2016
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Constant F2.8 ultra-wide zoom (14–28mm equiv.) with IPX1 sealing and 7.5cm close focus.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2015
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 8 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (4 stops vs 0 stops)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO has lower Min focus distance (7.5 cm vs 140 cm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO has lower Weight (534 g vs 1475 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO has lower Length (98 mm vs 227 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO has higher Max magnification (0.24 × vs 0.11 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
⌀93 × 227 mm
1475 g (3.25 lb / 52.03 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
⌀78 × 98 mm
534 g (1.18 lb / 18.84 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 129mm longer and 15mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO is 941 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 3 HR, 1 E-HR
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
4 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.24 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical ED, 1 DSA, 1 Super ED…
- ✓
Min focus distance
7.5 cm vs 140 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
534 g vs 1475 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
98 mm vs 227 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
78 mm vs 92.5 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.