OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO — 25mm f/1.2 for Micro Four Thirds, a popular choice in the om-system lineup.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Micro Four Thirds Mount
414g ultra-wide PRO II with improved edge sharpness and the same f/2.8 constant aperture.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II is 6.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has higher Max magnification (0.2 × vs 0.12 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Length (87 mm vs 106 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Diameter (68 mm vs 78 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀68 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
⌀78 × 106 mm
414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 19mm shorter and 10mm narrower than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 4 g lighter than M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 1 DSA, 3 ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 106 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68 mm vs 78 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.2 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
410 g vs 414 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
20 cm vs 22 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.