OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
World-first 2:1 macro telephoto with 5-axis Sync IS and IP53 weather sealing.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Feb 2023
Panasonic
LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S. — 100mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Jun 2020
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 2.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Wins
LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher Max magnification (2 × vs 1 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has lower Weight (453 g vs 740 g)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO has higher OIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 5 stops)
- BLUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S. has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
- BLUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S. has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
⌀69 × 136 mm
453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
⌀81 × 154 mm
740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 18mm shorter and 12mm narrower than LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S..
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO is 287 g lighter than LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S..
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Super ED, 2 ED, 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Max magnification
2 × vs 1 × — higher is better
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO supports it
- ✓
Weight
453 g vs 740 g — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.4 cm vs 28 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
69 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
136 mm vs 154 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
Pros
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO and LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S. at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm F3.5 Macro IS PRO
Panasonic LUMIX S 100mm F2.8 Macro O.I.S.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.