Viltrox
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z — 28–75mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$699
Launch priceReleased Apr 2023
Viltrox
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z — 35mm f/1.2 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z is 1.4 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Wins
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has higher Max magnification (0.26 × vs 0.1 ×)
- BAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- BAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/2.8)
- AAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Weight (550 g vs 920 g)
- AAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z has lower Diameter (75 mm vs 82 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareAF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
⌀75 × 117 mm
550 g (1.21 lb / 19.40 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
⌀82 × 109 mm
920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z is 8mm longer and 7mm narrower than AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z.
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z is 370 g lighter than AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 1 HR
- ✓
Weight
550 g vs 920 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.26 × vs 0.1 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
75 mm vs 82 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 3 HR
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
35 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
109 mm vs 117 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Nikon Z mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z and AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z at major authorized retailers.
Viltrox AF 28-75mm F2.8 Z
Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.