Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS-1D X Mark II

Legendary sports DSLR with 14fps and 4K DCI — still seen on sidelines.

$5,999

Released Feb 2016

vs
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 9.8 years newer.

Wins

3categories

EOS-1D X Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

7 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS-1D X Mark II wins 1 categories·EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 20.2 MP)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS-1D X Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Resolution20.2 MP32.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20064,000
Burst30 fps40 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8.5-stop
Weight720 g699 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS-1D X Mark II is 21 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 mm

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 88 mm

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS-1D X Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS-1D X Mark IIEOS R6 Mark III
Portrait
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS-1D X Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it

  • Resolution

    32.5 MP vs 20.2 MP — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS-1D X Mark II

Pros

  • 14fps mechanical
  • Pro tank build
  • 4K DCI video

Cons

  • Discontinued
  • 20MP
  • Very heavy

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Resolution
20.2 MP
32.5 MP+61%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
40 fps+33%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames+33%
150 frames
EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Max resolution
4K UHD
7K RAW
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
2600 Mbps17.3× more
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
EOS-1D X Mark II
EOS R6 Mark III
Weight
720 g
699 g−21 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS-1D X Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS-1D X Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark III — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS-1D X Mark II is 20.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS-1D X Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while eOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS-1D X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?

EOS-1D X Mark II weighs 720 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS-1D X Mark II: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS-1D X Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS-1D X Mark II launched at $5,999 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS R6 Mark III is $3,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.