Canon
EOS-1D X Mark II
Legendary sports DSLR with 14fps and 4K DCI — still seen on sidelines.
$5,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2016
Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
EOS R6 Mark III is 9.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS-1D X Mark II
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
7 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 20.2 MP)
- AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
- BEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareEOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III share virtually identical body dimensions.
EOS-1D X Mark II is 21 g heavier than EOS R6 Mark III.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark II · 88mm EOS R6 Mark III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS-1D X Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS-1D X Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS-1D X Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only EOS R6 Mark III supports it
Resolution
32.5 MP vs 20.2 MP — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 1053
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS-1D X Mark II
Pros
- ✓14fps mechanical
- ✓Pro tank build
- ✓4K DCI video
Cons
- –Discontinued
- –20MP
- –Very heavy
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, EOS-1D X Mark II or EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS-1D X Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark III — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS-1D X Mark II is 20.2 MP and EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS-1D X Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark II or the EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS-1D X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III?
EOS-1D X Mark II weighs 720 g and EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g, so the EOS R6 Mark III is 21 g lighter.
Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III record 4K video?
EOS-1D X Mark II: 4K up to 60p. EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS-1D X Mark II and EOS R6 Mark III weather sealed?
EOS-1D X Mark II: Yes. EOS R6 Mark III: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS R6 Mark III, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS-1D X Mark II launched at $5,999 and EOS R6 Mark III at $2,799. The EOS R6 Mark III is $3,200 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS-1D X Mark II vs EOS R6 Mark III vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.