Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS-1D X Mark II

Legendary sports DSLR with 14fps and 4K DCI — still seen on sidelines.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Feb 2016

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 9.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS-1D X Mark II

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifePortrait

6 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS-1D X Mark II wins 2 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 95 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 20.2 MP)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,686,400)

Key specs at a glance

EOS-1D X Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Resolution20.2 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop7.5-stop
Weight720 g695 g
Battery520 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

EOS-1D X Mark II is 8mm wider, 2mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 7 V.

EOS-1D X Mark II is 25 g heavier than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark II · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS-1D X Mark IIAlpha 7 V
Portrait
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS-1D X Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car, Train…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A / SD UHS-II

  • Resolution

    33 MP vs 20.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS-1D X Mark II

Pros

  • 14fps mechanical
  • Pro tank build
  • 4K DCI video

Cons

  • Discontinued
  • 20MP
  • Very heavy

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
20.2 MP
33 MP+63%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 V
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car, Train, Airplane

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS-1D X Mark II or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 8.0/10 versus 6.0/10 for EOS-1D X Mark II — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

EOS-1D X Mark II is 20.2 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

EOS-1D X Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark II or the Alpha 7 V?

EOS-1D X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V?

EOS-1D X Mark II weighs 720 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the Alpha 7 V is 25 g lighter.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

EOS-1D X Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

EOS-1D X Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark II and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the Alpha 7 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS-1D X Mark II launched at $5,999 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The Alpha 7 V is $3,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.