Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS-1D X Mark II

Legendary sports DSLR with 14fps and 4K DCI — still seen on sidelines.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Feb 2016

vs
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

Alpha 7 IV is 5.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS-1D X Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS-1D X Mark II wins 2 categories·Alpha 7 IV wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 200 frames)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 10 fps)
  • BAlpha 7 IV has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 20.2 MP)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,686,400)

Key specs at a glance

EOS-1D X Mark IIAlpha 7 IV
Resolution20.2 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20051,200
Burst30 fps10 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5.5-stop
Weight720 g658 g
Battery520 shots580 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

EOS-1D X Mark II is 7mm wider, 2mm taller, and 8mm thicker than Alpha 7 IV.

EOS-1D X Mark II is 62 g heavier than Alpha 7 IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark II · 80mm Alpha 7 IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 IV back view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS-1D X Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 IV top view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 80 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS-1D X Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS-1D X Mark IIAlpha 7 IV
Portrait
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS-1D X Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS-1D X Mark II supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5.5 stops — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 200 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 IV supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Resolution

    33 MP vs 20.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 51,200
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS-1D X Mark II

Pros

  • 14fps mechanical
  • Pro tank build
  • 4K DCI video

Cons

  • Discontinued
  • 20MP
  • Very heavy

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Resolution
20.2 MP
33 MP+63%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
EOS-1D X Mark II
Alpha 7 IV
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS-1D X Mark II or Alpha 7 IV?

EOS-1D X Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for Alpha 7 IV — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV?

EOS-1D X Mark II is 20.2 MP and Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS-1D X Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark II or the Alpha 7 IV?

EOS-1D X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV?

EOS-1D X Mark II weighs 720 g and Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g, so the Alpha 7 IV is 62 g lighter.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV record 4K video?

EOS-1D X Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7 IV weather sealed?

EOS-1D X Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7 IV: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark II and 580 shots for the Alpha 7 IV, giving the Alpha 7 IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS-1D X Mark II launched at $5,999 and Alpha 7 IV at $2,499. The Alpha 7 IV is $3,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS-1D X Mark II vs Alpha 7 IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.