Canon
EOS-1D X Mark II
Legendary sports DSLR with 14fps and 4K DCI — still seen on sidelines.
$5,999
Released Feb 2016
Sony
Alpha 7R VI
66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.
$4,499
Released Jun 2026
Alpha 7R VI is 10.3 years newer.
Wins
EOS-1D X Mark II
Wins
Alpha 7R VI
3 categories tied
Check current prices
Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.2 MP)
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 5,760,000)
- AEOS-1D X Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 32,000)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
Alpha 7R VI
133 × 97 × 83 mm
713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)
EOS-1D X Mark II is 5mm wider, 1mm taller, and 5mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.
EOS-1D X Mark II is 7 g heavier than Alpha 7R VI.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark II · 83mm Alpha 7R VI
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Alpha 7R VI
133 × 97 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS-1D X Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Alpha 7R VI
133 × 83 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS-1D X Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Alpha 7R VI
35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame
862 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS-1D X Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Alpha 7R VI
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS-1D X Mark II
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
AA filter
Only EOS-1D X Mark II supports it
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only EOS-1D X Mark II supports it
Weather sealing
Only EOS-1D X Mark II supports it
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 32,000 — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 759 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7R VI
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Resolution
66.8 MP vs 20.2 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
EVF resolution
9,437,184 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Eye, Insect
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (electronic) — Both 30 fps
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS-1D X Mark II
Pros
- ✓14fps mechanical
- ✓Pro tank build
- ✓4K DCI video
Cons
- –Discontinued
- –20MP
- –Very heavy
Alpha 7R VI
Pros
- ✓66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
- ✓30fps blackout-free electronic burst
- ✓8K 30p and 4K 120p video
- ✓8.5-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Large files demand fast cards and storage
- –8K workflow can be heavy
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS-1D X Mark II or Alpha 7R VI?
EOS-1D X Mark II scores 9.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for Alpha 7R VI — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?
EOS-1D X Mark II is 20.2 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?
EOS-1D X Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark II or the Alpha 7R VI?
EOS-1D X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?
EOS-1D X Mark II weighs 720 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the Alpha 7R VI is 7 g lighter.
Do the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?
EOS-1D X Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS-1D X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?
EOS-1D X Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark II and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS-1D X Mark II launched at $5,999 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The Alpha 7R VI is $1,500 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.