Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS C400

RF-mount Super 35 cinema camera with 6K 60p, Cinema RAW Light, and built-in 9-stop ND.

$7,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

EOS C400 is 1.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

EOS C400

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS C400 wins 3 categories·E2-M4 wins 2 categories
  • BE2-M4 has lower Weight (370 g vs 1450 g)
  • AEOS C400 has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BE2-M4 has higher Resolution (10.28 MP vs 6.2 MP)
  • AEOS C400 has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AEOS C400 has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS C400E2-M4
Resolution6.2 MP10.28 MP
Sensor26.1 × 13.8 mmMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop6-stop
Weight1450 g370 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS C400

162 × 138 × 130 mm

1450 g (3.20 lb / 51.15 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

EOS C400 is 71mm wider, 72mm taller, and 58mm thicker than E2-M4.

EOS C400 is 1080 g heavier than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 130mm EOS C400 · 72mm E2-M4

Sensor size, to scale

EOS C400

26.1 × 13.8 mm · APS-C

360 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

1.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS C400

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS C400E2-M4
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS C400

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, XF-AVC, Apple ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 162, 138, 130

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • Codecs

    Adds ZRAW, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • Weight

    370 g vs 1450 g — lower is better

  • AA filter

    Only E2-M4 supports it

  • Resolution

    10.28 MP vs 6.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS C400

Pros

  • 6K 60p internal
  • Built-in 9-stop ND
  • Dual gain sensor
  • RF mount

Cons

  • Super 35 only
  • Premium price
  • Large media needs

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS C400 and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS C400
E2-M4
Resolution
6.2 MP
10.28 MP+66%
Sensor type
Super 35 Dual Gain CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
26.1 × 13.8 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
EOS C400
E2-M4
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS C400
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS C400
E2-M4
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS C400 or E2-M4?

E2-M4 scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS C400 — 370g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS C400 and E2-M4?

EOS C400 is 6.2 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the E2-M4 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS C400 and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS C400 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS C400 or the E2-M4?

EOS C400 reaches 20 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS C400 and E2-M4?

EOS C400 weighs 1450 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 1080 g lighter.

Do the EOS C400 and E2-M4 record 4K video?

EOS C400: 6K 60p (max), 4K up to 120p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS C400 and E2-M4 weather sealed?

EOS C400: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS C400 and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS C400 launched at $7,999 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $6,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS C400 vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.