Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Sep 2016

EOS R1 is 7.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

Lumix FZ2500

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Lumix FZ2500
Resolution24.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps50 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight920 g966 g
Battery1330 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

EOS R1 is 47mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500 but it is also 20mm wider and 48mm taller.

EOS R1 is 46 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 135 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix FZ2500: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Lumix FZ2500
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4, AVCHD

  • Burst (electronic)

    50 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Aperture
f/2.8-4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
26-520 mm
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
102,400+3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
25,600
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R1 or Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the EOS R1 is 46 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 350 shots for the Lumix FZ2500, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Lumix FZ2500 is $5,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Lumix FZ2500 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.