Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Released Sep 2016

EOS R1 is 7.8 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R1

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

2categories

Lumix FZ2500

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Lumix FZ2500
Resolution24.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps50 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight1115 g966 g
Battery350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

1115 g (2.46 lb / 39.33 oz)

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

EOS R1 is 47mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500 but it is also 20mm wider and 48mm taller.

EOS R1 is 149 g heavier than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 135 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix FZ2500: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Lumix FZ2500
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4, AVCHD

  • Burst (electronic)

    50 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    966 g vs 1115 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF with cross-type AF
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
50 fps+25%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
20 frames
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Max resolution
6K RAW
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log L optional
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264, MOV, MP4, AVCHD
EOS R1
Lumix FZ2500
Weight
1115 g
966 g−149 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
157.6 × 149.5 × 87.3 mm
137.6 × 101.9 × 134.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R1 or Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R1 weighs 1115 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the Lumix FZ2500 is 149 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R1 and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Lumix FZ2500 is $5,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.