Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Released Sep 2016

EOS R6 Mark II is 6.2 years newer.

Wins

15categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Lumix FZ2500

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 20 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 350 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix FZ2500
Resolution24.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps50 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g966 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm shorter and 46mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500 but it is also 1mm wider.

EOS R6 Mark II is 286 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 135 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix FZ2500: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix FZ2500
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 20 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4, AVCHD

  • Burst (electronic)

    50 fps vs 40 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix FZ2500
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix FZ2500
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
50 fps+25%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames9× more
20 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix FZ2500
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log L optional
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264, MOV, MP4, AVCHD
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix FZ2500
Weight
680 g−286 g less
966 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
137.6 × 101.9 × 134.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix FZ2500 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix FZ2500?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 286 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the Lumix FZ2500, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Lumix FZ2500 is $1,300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.