Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 II

24MP sports body with 20fps and proven pro workflow.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2019

EOS R1 is 4.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

Alpha 9 II

PortraitTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Alpha 9 II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,686,400)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 690 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Alpha 9 II
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS8.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight920 g678 g
Battery1330 shots690 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 II

129 × 96 × 78 mm

678 g (1.49 lb / 23.92 oz)

EOS R1 is 29mm wider, 53mm taller, and 10mm thicker than Alpha 9 II.

EOS R1 is 242 g heavier than Alpha 9 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 78mm Alpha 9 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 II

129 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 II

129 × 78 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 9 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 9 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Alpha 9 II
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 3,686,400 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128.9, 96.4, 77.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Weight

    678 g vs 920 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Alpha 9 II

Pros

  • 20fps silent burst
  • Sports AF
  • Dual slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Older than A9 III
  • No global shutter

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Alpha 9 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R1
Alpha 9 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ X
EOS R1
Alpha 9 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
204,800
EOS R1
Alpha 9 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R1 or Alpha 9 II?

EOS R1 scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for Alpha 9 II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 II has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Alpha 9 II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 9 II reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Alpha 9 II weighs 678 g, so the Alpha 9 II is 242 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 9 II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R1 and Alpha 9 II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Alpha 9 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 690 shots for the Alpha 9 II, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Alpha 9 II at $4,499. The Alpha 9 II is $1,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Alpha 9 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.