Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 II

24MP sports body with 20fps and proven pro workflow.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

Alpha 9 II

PortraitTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 9 II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 693)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 9 II
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop5.5-stop
Weight670 g678 g
Battery760 shots690 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 II

129 × 96 × 78 mm

678 g (1.49 lb / 23.92 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 10mm wider, 2mm taller, and 11mm thicker than Alpha 9 II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 8 g lighter than Alpha 9 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 78mm Alpha 9 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 II

129 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 II

129 × 78 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 9 II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 9 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 9 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128.9, 96.4, 77.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 9 II

Pros

  • 20fps silent burst
  • Sports AF
  • Dual slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Older than A9 III
  • No global shutter

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9 II
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ X
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for Alpha 9 II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 II has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 9 II reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Alpha 9 II weighs 678 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 8 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 9 II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 9 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 690 shots for the Alpha 9 II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 9 II at $4,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Alpha 9 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.