Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs

Sony

Alpha 99 II

42MP A-mount flagship with translucent mirror, 12fps, and 5-axis IBIS for Sony/Minolta lenses.

$3,199

Launch price

Released Nov 2016

EOS R1 is 7.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

Alpha 99 II

WildlifePortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 5 categories·Alpha 99 II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R1 has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 3,690,000)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 640 shots)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Alpha 99 II
Resolution24.2 MP42.4 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop4.5-stop
Weight920 g849 g
Battery1330 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 99 II

143 × 105 × 82 mm

849 g (1.87 lb / 29.95 oz)

EOS R1 is 15mm wider, 45mm taller, and 6mm thicker than Alpha 99 II.

EOS R1 is 71 g heavier than Alpha 99 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 82mm Alpha 99 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 99 II

143 × 105 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 99 II

143 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 99 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 99 II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Alpha 99 II
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 640 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 99 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.6, 104.8, 81.6

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Resolution

    42.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    849 g vs 920 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Alpha 99 II

Pros

  • 42MP A-mount
  • 5-axis IBIS
  • 12fps
  • Huge Minolta lens library

Cons

  • A-mount declining
  • Translucent mirror system
  • Large body

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Alpha 99 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
42.4 MP+75%
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R1
Alpha 99 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS R1
Alpha 99 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
102,400
EOS R1
Alpha 99 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R1 or Alpha 99 II?

EOS R1 scores 9.0/10 versus 6.0/10 for Alpha 99 II — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 99 II is 42.4 MP, so the Alpha 99 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 99 II has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Alpha 99 II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 99 II reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Alpha 99 II weighs 849 g, so the Alpha 99 II is 71 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 99 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R1 and Alpha 99 II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Alpha 99 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 640 shots for the Alpha 99 II, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Alpha 99 II at $3,199. The Alpha 99 II is $3,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Alpha 99 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.