Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 99 II

42MP A-mount flagship with translucent mirror, 12fps, and 5-axis IBIS for Sony/Minolta lenses.

$3,199

Launch price

Released Nov 2016

EOS R6 Mark II is 6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

Alpha 99 II

WildlifePortrait

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Alpha 99 II wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 4.5 stops)
  • BAlpha 99 II has higher Resolution (42.4 MP vs 24.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 99 II
Resolution24.2 MP42.4 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop4.5-stop
Weight670 g849 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 99 II

143 × 105 × 82 mm

849 g (1.87 lb / 29.95 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm narrower and 6mm shorter than Alpha 99 II but it is also 7mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 179 g lighter than Alpha 99 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 82mm Alpha 99 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 99 II

143 × 105 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 99 II

143 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 99 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 99 II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 99 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 4.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 99 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.6, 104.8, 81.6

  • Resolution

    42.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 99 II

Pros

  • 42MP A-mount
  • 5-axis IBIS
  • 12fps
  • Huge Minolta lens library

Cons

  • A-mount declining
  • Translucent mirror system
  • Large body

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 99 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
42.4 MP+75%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 99 II
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 99 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 99 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 99 II?

Alpha 99 II scores 9.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for EOS R6 Mark II — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 99 II is 42.4 MP, so the Alpha 99 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 99 II has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 99 II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 99 II reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Alpha 99 II weighs 849 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 179 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 99 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 99 II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 99 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the Alpha 99 II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 99 II at $3,199. The EOS R6 Mark II is $700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Alpha 99 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.