Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS R3

Pro 24MP full-frame stacked-sensor body built for sports, news, wildlife, and high-speed hybrid capture.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2021

vs
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

EOS R3 is 2 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

13categories

EOS R3

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

3categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R3 wins 5 categories·fp L wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R3 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R3 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R3 has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 12 frames)
  • AEOS R3 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AEOS R3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R3fp L
Resolution24.1 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst30 fps10 fps
4K120 fps29.97 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight1015 g427 g
Battery620 shots240 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R3

150 × 143 × 87 mm

1015 g (2.24 lb / 35.80 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

EOS R3 is 37mm wider, 73mm taller, and 42mm thicker than fp L.

EOS R3 is 588 g heavier than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R3 · 45mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R3

150 × 143 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R3

150 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R3

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

fp L: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R3fp L
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R3

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 142.6, 87.2

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 12 frames — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 24.1 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    427 g vs 1015 g — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only fp L supports it

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R3

Pros

  • 30fps electronic burst from a stacked full-frame sensor
  • Exceptional low-light AF down to -7.5 EV
  • Integrated pro body with large LP-E19 battery
  • 6K RAW video and 4K 120p
  • Rugged weather-sealed construction

Cons

  • 24MP resolution trails higher-detail rivals
  • Large integrated-grip body
  • Expensive compared with enthusiast full-frame bodies

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R3 and fp L at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R3
fp L
Resolution
24.1 MP
61 MP2.5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36 x 24
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R3
fp L
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R3
fp L
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R3
fp L
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R3 or fp L?

EOS R3 scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for fp L — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R3 and fp L?

EOS R3 is 24.1 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R3 and fp L have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R3 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while fp L does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R3 or the fp L?

EOS R3 reaches 30 fps electronic. fp L reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R3 and fp L?

EOS R3 weighs 1015 g and fp L weighs 427 g, so the fp L is 588 g lighter.

Do the EOS R3 and fp L record 4K video?

EOS R3: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. fp L: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the EOS R3 and fp L weather sealed?

EOS R3: Yes. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 620 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R3 and 240 shots for the fp L, giving the EOS R3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R3 launched at $5,999 and fp L at $2,499. The fp L is $3,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R3 vs fp L vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sigma press materials.