Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R3

Pro 24MP full-frame stacked-sensor body built for sports, news, wildlife, and high-speed hybrid capture.

$5,999

Released Sep 2021

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 4.8 years newer.

Wins

5categories

EOS R3

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

4categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R3 wins 2 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 3 categories
  • AEOS R3 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AEOS R3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 24.1 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 5,760,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has lower Weight (713 g vs 1015 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R3Alpha 7R VI
Resolution24.1 MP66.8 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight1015 g713 g
Battery620 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R3

150 × 143 × 87 mm

1015 g (2.24 lb / 35.80 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

EOS R3 is 17mm wider, 46mm taller, and 4mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.

EOS R3 is 302 g heavier than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R3 · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R3

150 × 143 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R3

150 × 87 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R3

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R3Alpha 7R VI
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R3

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 142.6, 87.2

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R3 supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R3 supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 24.1 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 5,760,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    713 g vs 1015 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.9 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • RAW buffer depthBoth 150 frames
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R3

Pros

  • 30fps electronic burst from a stacked full-frame sensor
  • Exceptional low-light AF down to -7.5 EV
  • Integrated pro body with large LP-E19 battery
  • 6K RAW video and 4K 120p
  • Rugged weather-sealed construction

Cons

  • 24MP resolution trails higher-detail rivals
  • Large integrated-grip body
  • Expensive compared with enthusiast full-frame bodies

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R3
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
24.1 MP
66.8 MP2.8× more
Sensor type
Full Frame Stacked BSI CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R3
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
1053+39%
759
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Motorsport vehicles
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
EOS R3
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
150 frames
EOS R3
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
6K RAW
8K
4K max frame rate
120 fps
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps4.3× more
600 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R3
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
1015 g
713 g−302 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
150 × 142.6 × 87.2 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R3 or Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R3 scores 7.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Alpha 7R VI — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R3 and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R3 is 24.1 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R3 and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R3 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R3 or the Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R3 reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R3 and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R3 weighs 1015 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the Alpha 7R VI is 302 g lighter.

Do the EOS R3 and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

EOS R3: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R3 and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

EOS R3: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 620 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R3 and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the EOS R3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R3 launched at $5,999 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The Alpha 7R VI is $1,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.