Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 C

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2022

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's AI processing unit.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 4.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

EOS R5 C

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 2 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 3 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Battery life (CIPA) (600 shots vs 220 shots)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Max video bit rate (1360 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 83 frames)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 5,790,000)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 32,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CAlpha 7R VI
Resolution45 MP66.8 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight770 g713 g
Battery220 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C front view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 × 112 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

EOS R5 C is 10mm wider, 5mm taller, and 29mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.

EOS R5 C is 57 g heavier than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 112mm EOS R5 C · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C back view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C top view

EOS R5 C

142 × 112 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good
7.5Good
Travel
2.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, AVC-LongG, MP4…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.2, 101.6, 111.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)

  • Max video bit rate

    1360 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R5 C supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only EOS R5 C supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    600 shots vs 220 shots — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye, Insect, Vehicle

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only Alpha 7R VI supports it

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 83 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 5,790,000 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP stacked full-frame sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
45 MP
66.8 MP+48%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
EOS R5 C
Alpha 7R VI
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR with AI processing unit
EOS R5 C
Alpha 7R VI
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 C
Alpha 7R VI
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical focal plane shutter + electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R5 C or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R5 C is 45 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while Alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the Alpha 7R VI is 57 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 C and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 220 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

Both launched at $4,499.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 C vs Alpha 7R VI vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.