Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5 C

Canon

EOS R5 C

Cinema-focused 45MP full-frame hybrid with active cooling, 8K RAW 60p, and Canon Cinema EOS video tools.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2022

vs

Sony

FX30

Super 35 cinema camera with 4K 120p and affordable entry to Sony Cinema Line.

$1,799

Launch price

Released Sep 2022

FX30 is 8 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R5 C

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

3categories

FX30

Video & HybridTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 C wins 3 categories·FX30 wins 2 categories
  • BFX30 has higher IBIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BFX30 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (570 shots vs 220 shots)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Max video bit rate (1360 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 495)
  • AEOS R5 C has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 10 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5 CFX30
Resolution45 MP26 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max51,20032,000
Burst20 fps10 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBISNo5-stop
Weight770 g646 g
Battery220 shots570 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 C front view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 × 112 mm

770 g (1.70 lb / 27.16 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FX30

130 × 78 × 85 mm

646 g (1.42 lb / 22.79 oz)

EOS R5 C is 13mm wider, 24mm taller, and 27mm thicker than FX30.

EOS R5 C is 124 g heavier than FX30.

Depth (front-to-back): 112mm EOS R5 C · 85mm FX30

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 C back view

EOS R5 C

142 × 102 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FX30

130 × 78 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 C top view

EOS R5 C

142 × 112 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

FX30

130 × 85 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5 C

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

FX30

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5 C

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX30

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5 CFX30
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
2.5Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5 C

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Cinema RAW Light, AVC-LongG, MP4…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 142.2, 101.6, 111.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II)

  • Max video bit rate

    1360 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 495 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 26 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FX30

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.7, 77.8, 84.5

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    570 shots vs 220 shots — higher is better

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only FX30 supports it

  • Weight

    646 g vs 770 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5 C

Pros

  • 8K RAW 60p internal recording with active cooling
  • Cinema EOS interface and professional video tools
  • 45MP full-frame stills capability
  • 4K 120p slow motion
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • No in-body stabilization
  • Battery life is limited for high-end video
  • Larger body than the EOS R5

FX30

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • Affordable cinema
  • Active cooling
  • Log profiles

Cons

  • Super 35 crop
  • 26MP stills crop
  • No full-frame

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 C and FX30 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5 C
FX30
Resolution
45 MP+73%
26 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
23.3 × 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
EOS R5 C
FX30
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR
EOS R5 C
FX30
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+0.7 stops
32,000
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5 C
FX30
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R5 C or FX30?

FX30 scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for EOS R5 C — 646g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 C and FX30?

EOS R5 C is 45 MP and FX30 is 26 MP, so the EOS R5 C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 C and FX30 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 C does not have IBIS, while FX30 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 C or the FX30?

EOS R5 C reaches 20 fps electronic. FX30 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 C and FX30?

EOS R5 C weighs 770 g and FX30 weighs 646 g, so the FX30 is 124 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 C and FX30 record 4K video?

EOS R5 C: 4K up to 120p. FX30: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R5 C and FX30 weather sealed?

EOS R5 C: Yes. FX30: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 220 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 C and 570 shots for the FX30, giving the FX30 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 C launched at $4,499 and FX30 at $1,799. The FX30 is $2,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 C vs FX30 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.