Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Osmo Pocket 4

DJI

Osmo Pocket 4

Fourth-gen 1-inch pocket gimbal camera with 4K/240fps slow-motion, 14-stop D-Log, ActiveTrack 7.0, 107GB built-in storage, and 240-min battery.

$499

Launch price

Released Apr 2026

Osmo Pocket 4 is 3.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

Osmo Pocket 4

Sports & Action

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 3 categories·Osmo Pocket 4 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs -1 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • BOsmo Pocket 4 has lower Weight (190.5 g vs 670 g)
  • BOsmo Pocket 4 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIOsmo Pocket 4
Resolution24.2 MP37 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g190.5 g
Battery760 shots-1 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo Pocket 4 front view

Osmo Pocket 4

34 × 144 × 44 mm

190.5 g (0.42 lb / 6.72 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 46mm shorter than Osmo Pocket 4 but it is also 105mm wider and 44mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 480 g heavier than Osmo Pocket 4.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 44mm Osmo Pocket 4

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Pocket 4 back view

Osmo Pocket 4

34 × 144 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo Pocket 4 top view

Osmo Pocket 4

34 × 44 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Osmo Pocket 4

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo Pocket 4: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIOsmo Pocket 4
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs -1 shots — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 4

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 33.5, 144.2, 44.4

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    190.5 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC (H.265)

  • Resolution

    37 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Osmo Pocket 4

Pros

  • 4K/240fps slow-motion
  • 14-stop dynamic range + 10-bit D-Log
  • 107GB built-in + 800MB/s transfer
  • 240-min battery life

Cons

  • No US official sale (FCC pending)
  • No weathersealing
  • Fixed lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 4
Resolution
24.2 MP
37 MP+53%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 4
Aperture
f/2.0
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 4
Processor
DIGIC X
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 4
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
102,400+3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
25,600
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo Pocket 4
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo Pocket 4?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Pocket 4 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Pocket 4 is 37 MP, so the Osmo Pocket 4 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Pocket 4 uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Osmo Pocket 4?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Pocket 4 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo Pocket 4 weighs 190.5 g, so the Osmo Pocket 4 is 480 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Pocket 4: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Pocket 4: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and -1 shots for the Osmo Pocket 4, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo Pocket 4 at $499. The Osmo Pocket 4 is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo Pocket 4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.