Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
DJI
Osmo Pocket 4P
Dual-lens pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch wide and 1/1.28-inch tele sensors, 37MP stills, 4K/240fps slow motion, 103GB built-in storage, and 210-min battery.
—
Launch priceReleased Jun 2026
Osmo Pocket 4P is 3.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
Osmo Pocket 4P
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- BOsmo Pocket 4P has lower Weight (230 g vs 670 g)
- BOsmo Pocket 4P has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 180 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Pocket 4P
34 × 160 × 63 mm
230 g (0.51 lb / 8.11 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 61mm shorter than Osmo Pocket 4P but it is also 105mm wider and 25mm thicker.
EOS R6 Mark II is 440 g heavier than Osmo Pocket 4P.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 63mm Osmo Pocket 4P
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Pocket 4P
34 × 160 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Pocket 4P
34 × 63 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Osmo Pocket 4P
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Pocket 4P: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds H.265, H.264
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Eye AF
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Animal / bird AF
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo Pocket 4P
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 33.5, 159.5, 63.3
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
230 g vs 670 g — lower is better
ISO min (native)
50 vs 100 — lower is better
Resolution
37 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓IBIS effectiveness — Both 8 stops
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Osmo Pocket 4P
Pros
- ✓Dual 20mm + 60mm equivalent lenses
- ✓4K/240fps wide-lens slow motion
- ✓37MP stills with 9x photo zoom
- ✓103GB built-in storage + 1TB microSD
Cons
- –No weathersealing
- –Fixed dual-lens system
- –Price not yet listed on DJI specs page
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
DJI Osmo Pocket 4P
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo Pocket 4P?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 6.5/10 versus 0.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 4P — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Pocket 4P is 37 MP, so the Osmo Pocket 4P captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Pocket 4P uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo Pocket 4P weighs 230 g, so the Osmo Pocket 4P is 440 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Pocket 4P: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Pocket 4P weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Pocket 4P: No.
How much does the EOS R6 Mark II cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo Pocket 4P vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.